![]() However, the 7D isn't just a 50D with a new sensor, viewfinder and revised body - other headline changes include a new AF system with a dedicated processor, dual Digic 4 processors and a new shutter mechanism to allow 8fps continuous shooting, and the ability to control groups of external flashguns using its built-in flash. 1.0X magnification and 100% coverage offers a noticeable improvement over the 0.95X, 95% finder in the EOS 50D and puts the camera on the same footing as the D300S (Its 0.94X finder ends up essentially the same size, once the focal length multiplier effect of its fractionally larger sensor is taken into account). And indeed, this is intended as big brother to the 50D, rather than as a replacement for it.įor a start, the camera is built around a new 18MP sensor, but the thing you're likely to notice before you even fire a shot is the impressive new viewfinder. At first glance it looks a lot like the EOS 50D - it's unmistakably a member of the EOS family - but a closer look shows that this is far from being the gentle refresh that we're used to seeing in this range. Which brings us to the 7D, a camera that seems determined to wrestle back the king of APS-C crown. Cameras such as Sony's A700 and Nikon's D200 and 300 have meant the most recent X0D EOSs have been held to higher standards and have found it a little harder to stand-out. However, like every other sector of the DSLR market, there are some very competitive rivals, in terms of both price and features. The 10D, 20D and 30D were hugely successful and popular cameras, and you didn't have to spend long shooting with them to understand why. For this specific shot though, the Canon files feels better as the forest in the background was already very distracting.Canon's X0D series was, for many years, essentially the default choice for keen enthusiasts, professionals and aspiring-professionals who wanted top-level image quality and functionality without the bulk (or price) of a pro-level camera such as the 1D series. It’s really up to you if you prefer one over the another. I was able to match colors within a minute but what stands out the most is the depth of field difference. I was curious to see how different my final files will look and how easy or hard it will be to edit different files. I tried to shoot side by side during couple of engagement shoots. Fuji has a really good focusing system though and it was easier to use compared to my Canon 5D mark iii. It forces you to be more creative and not to rely on blurry background to make pretty images.īut I have to admit, when I was shooting both of my cameras, Canon and Fuji, side by side, in a dark forest, the Canon files were just nicer. I never liked that super soft, blurry f1.2 look my Canon 50mm produces.įuji photos are messy, gritty, the smaller sensor doesn’t do much for you. Something about the lack of the depth of field is also fun for me, as I’ve always liked incorporating backgrounds in my photographs. In solid light, I actually prefer the look of Fuji over my Canon. ![]() Too bad it might never happen, based on what Fujifilm’s PR puts out there lately. ![]() Canon and Nikon and Sony would have a big problem. I always said that if Fuji made a full frame camera, it would be the most popular camera on the market. Especially when you are not always in control of the light and angles and backgrounds, which happens a lot during weddings actually. I must say I don’t care about the full frame “look” 90 percent of the time there are definitely moments when my full frame Canon saves the date. Not having a full frame is apparently the biggest concern when thinking about getting Fuji for professional work. NO FULL FRAME AND SHALLOWER DEPTH OF FIELD And when put side by side against my Canon files, Fuji is right there, if not better. There is something about the rich greens and reds on Fuji which is exactly the look I am usually going for. That being said, I had to update some presets and now I actually enjoy editing again. What has worked for me on Canon has always looked strange on Fuji. It took me a while to figure out the the files, the x-trans sensors are just very different to what I am used to. I am not a big fan of the tones in raw images straight out of camera, but when you learn how to edit them, there is something special about the look and texture Fujifilm renders images. What always drew me towards Fuji, besides the obvious reasons, were the colors. I’m just gonna skip this part, you can find amazing reviews everywhere. Plus the image quality is very close to Canon, Nikon and Sony cameras. They’re small, fast, relatively cheap, they look great and their lenses are very solid. They’re just cool. There is no need to spend too much time talking about why Fuji cameras are so attractive.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |